体育在一国社会生活中占据的地位越来越重要，其中俱乐部和运动员作为主要参与者发挥的作用很大。体育实力亦成为各国综合国力的评价因素之一。各国都重视对运动员尤其是年轻运动员的培养。对于运动员转会各国普遍存在的转会费问题（在足球领域尤为突出）严重束缚了运动员的自由流动，阻碍了俱乐部之间的公平竞争，不利于运动员权益的保护和能力的发挥与提升。奥利弗•伯纳德（Olivier Bernard ）与法国里昂足球俱乐部培养案于2010年3月16日审结，欧洲法院判决：球员违反合同义务应当支付损害赔偿金而不是培养补偿。有关损害赔偿金的计算并不是根据俱乐部提供的训练培养支出，而是根据俱乐部的全部损失得出的。这个判决在明确欧盟法律对年轻球员赔偿的规制方面产生了重大影响，对我国在年轻球员的转会赔偿领域的立法也有重要的借鉴意义。本文拟分三部分进行：第一部分为“‘伯纳德案’始末”。该部分包括“伯纳德案”的案情简介（包括“伯纳德案”的起因和判决结果），“伯纳德案”的判决简析（主要从欧洲法院做出该判决的依据等方面来分析）。第二部分为“伯纳德案对欧洲足球的影响（包括伯纳德案判决的积极影响和该案判决的不足之处）”。第三部分为“‘伯纳德案’的判决对中国足球的借鉴意义”。该部分首先将分析我国国内球员转会制度的历史和现状，目前我国足球转会制度存在的缺陷、对策，最后总结上述分析得出结论并指出“伯纳德案”的判决对我国球员转会制度尤其是年轻球员转会赔偿问题的可借鉴之处。

The exercise of sports play a more and more important role in social life of a country，in which the players and clubs are the most important. The sport strength makes up one of the most significant factors of comprehensive national strength of a country. The training on Joueur espoir gains more and more attention. However，all kinds of disputes between the players and clubs on transfer fee remain a big problem, which restrict the free movement of the players and the fair competition between the clubs. The case on training compensation between Olympique Lyonnais and Oliver Bernared was judged on 16 March 2010.The court rules: the payment to the club which provided the training, not of compensation for training, but of damages, to which the player concerned would be liable for breach of his contractual obligations. The damage in question were not calculated in relation to the training costs incurred by the club providing that training but in relation to the total loss suffered by the club. The judgement, on the one hand, has a significant impact on specifying the EU law on the regulation of compensation of young players, on the other hand, has a significant reference for China’s legistation on the compensation of young players. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part generally gives a description of Bernard Case, including the cause of the case, the judgement done by the court and the limitations of the judgement. The second part is the impact on European foot of “Bernard case”. And the third part is the great influence of the judgement on China. In the third part, the author will analyze the developing progress and the current situation of transfer system in China, and considerate how to make the judgement of Bernard Case a significant reference for China’s legistation on the compensation of young players.