本文以国家博物馆藏宋拓《淳化阁帖》泉州本（以下简称国博泉本）为主要研究对象，借此展开对《淳化阁帖》泉州本系统的研究。本文以国博泉本为核心研究对象，对比其他几种泉本，从帖心银锭纹、卷号与版号、刻工名的数目及位置，以及存帖数目、帖次、 帖文的异同等特征展开逐字对比校勘，与此同时还将弗利尔本、肃府本、潘祖纯跋本、懋勤殿本等传世的善本《阁帖》纳入研究视野，意在发现几种宋拓版本系统之间的关系，从而对国博泉本作出较为准确的版本定位。

经过几种传世泉州本之间的对比校勘发现：国博泉本和上海图书馆藏宋拓泉州本（以下简称上图泉本）的主体部分出自同一帖石，且二者存在较多帖目互补现象，大约和“泉州本经张氏而析分为二部，各有半部真泉”的传闻有关。国博泉本和上图泉本相比，石裂纹较少，口也更清晰完整，明显是较早的拓本。国博泉本卷五和卷一的一小部分是由弗利尔本补配进来形成。上图泉本卷五后半部分是由肃府本补配而成，前半部分与故宫博物院宋保淳跋泉州本大约是同一底版。“晋府本”第六卷和安思远本卷六是同一底版。经过泉州本系统、弗利尔系统、肃府本系统以及潘祖纯跋本系统等多版本之间的对比校勘发现：传世宋拓本从刻工的精致程度上可以分为两个梯队，第一梯队是潘祖跋本和懋勤殿本，这两个版本是同一底版拓下，学界已考证其出自杭州孤山刻石。第二梯队是泉州本系统、弗利尔系统、肃府本系1统。无论从笔画细节，损泐程度，帖目完整性等方面，此三种系统均不如孤山刻石系统。这三个系统之间又各有优劣，难分高下。本项研究同时还确认了传世的几种泉州本之间存在着普遍联系。

As the main object of study, Song version of Chunhuage Tie inNational Museum collection (hereinafter referred to as Quan versionof NMC) is taken to launch a systematic research of Quanzhou versionsof it.

Through collating and comparing among variousversions--systems of Quanzhou, Flier, Sufu and Panzuchunba — it isdiscovered that descendant Song rubbings can be divided into twoechelons by fine degree of carving. The first tier, Panzuchunba andMaoqin version, were rubbed by the same slate which was proven tobe Hangzhou Gushan stone tablet by academics. The second tierincludes Quanzhou system, Flier system and Sufu system. In terms ofstrokes detail, loss crack and integrity, these three systems are allinferior to the Gushan stone carving system. Each of them has its ownadvantages and disadvantages that couldn’t be ranked. Meanwile,this research also confirmed the existence of common connectionsamong several descendant versions of Quanzhou.