在线诉讼在近年来的实践、理论热度都在不断走高，并发展出了异步审理等新模式，因其形式的特殊性，其启动程序需要考虑更多的情形，当事人的意思自治在其中也显得尤为重要。但《在线诉讼规则》就在线诉讼启动的意思自治规定并不统一，其中的部分同意制在主体层面及诉讼事项层面均存在自我矛盾，法院的参与也让相关规定更为复杂；同时，庭审环节在双方同意的表象下实质剥夺了不同意在线诉讼的当事人的程序选择权。因此，应当以在线诉讼各个环节的交互程度区分相应启动程序中需要达到的当事人意思自治程度，并将此合理融入普通在线诉讼、异步审理、互联网诉讼等情形，交互性环节需要双方当事人意思自治启动，而非交互性环节则仅单方当事人意思自治，这对于在线诉讼的有序、高效启动具有重要意义。

In recent years, the practice and theoretical popularity of online litigation have been increasing, and new modes such as asynchronous trial have been developed. Due to the particularity of its form, the starting process needs to consider more situations, and the autonomy of the parties is particularly important. However, the autonomy of the online litigation rules is not unified, and part of the consent system is self-contradictory in the subject level and the litigation matters level, and the participation of the court makes the relevant provisions more complicated. Meanwhile, the trial essentially denies the parties' procedural choice under the appearance of mutual agreement. Therefore, should be online litigation interaction degree of each link to distinguish the corresponding start in the parties to mean autonomy degree, and the reasonable into ordinary online litigation, asynchronous trial, Internet litigation, interactive links need the parties mean autonomy, rather than interactive link only unilateral parties mean autonomy, the orderly and efficient for online litigation start is of great significance.