随着社会经济、文化的发展以及科学技术的进步,编辑学作为一门理论与实践高度融 合的学科,近几年产生了新的时代特点,有了更加丰富的研究议题,产生了大批的研究成 果。然而,编辑学综述类研究没有引起学界的普遍关注,综述类研究成果相对贫乏。为了 科学分析有关编辑学研究成果的现状,本论文希望通过调查编辑出版类核心期刊的论文分 布情况,分析编辑学研究中的问题和不足,以及编辑学研究取得的进展,从而推动我国编 辑学研究的发展,这就是本研究的主旨所在。 相对于学术著作而言,专业学术期刊的出版周期较短、学术关注度高、社会影响时效 性强,在一定程度上反映行业研究动向与最新的研究成果,引领着行业的研究方向。在编 辑学研究领域,《编辑学报》《编辑之友》《中国编辑》《出版科学》《科技与出版》《现 代出版》作为我国编辑出版类的核心期刊,凭借着研究内容丰富、学术规范严谨,在编辑 学领域具有广泛的学术影响力和很强的知名度,在很大程度上代表着我国编辑出版学的研 究动向与研究进展状况。本论文以这六种期刊在 2010-2016 年所刊载的编辑学论文作为 研究对象,运用内容分析法和数理统计法,对六种期刊中的编辑学论文进行了全面梳理与 统计分析。 研究发现,整体而言,我国编辑学研究论文的数量呈逐年下降趋势,在各地区的数量 分布上差异较大,论文的研究方法相对单一;就研究者的情况而言,我国编辑学研究以个 人研究为主,多个学科对编辑学予以关注,且研究阵地集中在期刊杂志社,河南和湖北地 区高校的研究力量较为雄厚;就研究主题而言,编辑实务研究成果相对丰富,“编辑”“选 题策划”成为了近 7 年的研究热点,有关编辑史的研究,对编辑家的探讨也不乏亮点,然 而,有关编辑学理论的研究趋于沉寂。总体上看,与 2010 年前的研究成果相比较,我国 的编辑学研究在选题策划和编辑主体两个议题上有所突破和创新。 基于此,为了促进编辑学研究的进步,在未来的编辑学研究中,相关部门还应合理配 置研究资源,充分调动各方面的研究力量,加强学者间、学科间、地区间的合作交流,完 善我国编辑学研究的学术共同体建设;学者应加强对编辑学理论研究的重视,对编辑教育 和编辑技术的探讨也应有所深入,形成更加系统、稳定的论述成果;有关科学决策在选题 中的应用,学者应持续跟进、深化研究;新时代对编辑出版提出了新要求,编辑主体政治 素养的提升,也将是未来研究中学者需重点深入探讨的主题。

With the development of society, economy, culture, and science and technology, editorial studies, as a highly integrated subject of theory and practice, have produced new characteristics of the times in recent years. With more research topics, a large number of studies have been produced. Achievements. However, the study of the editorial review class did not arouse the general concern of the academic community. The research results of the review class are relatively poor. In order to scientifically analyze the current status of research on editorial research, this paper hopes to investigate the distribution of papers in editorial and publishing core journals, analyze the problems and deficiencies in editorial research, and the progress made in editorial research, so as to promote China's editorial research. This is the main thrust of this study. Compared with academic works, professional academic journals have a short publication cycle, high academic attention, and strong social influence. They reflect industry research trends and latest research results to a certain extent and lead the research direction of the industry. In the field of editorial research, "Editor's Journal", "Friend of Editors", "Chinese Editor", "Publishing Science", "Science & Technology, Publishing" and "Modern Publishing" are the core journals of China's editorial publishing, with rich research content and rigorous academic standards. In the field of editing science, it has a wide range of academic influence and strong popularity. It largely represents the research trends and research progress of China's editing and publishing science. This paper uses the edited papers published in 2010-2016 for these six journals as research objects. Using content analysis method and mathematical statistics method, this paper comprehensively reviews and statistically analyzes the edited papers of the six journals. The study found that, overall, the number of editorial research papers in our country has been declining year by year, and there has been a large difference in the quantitative distribution of the various regions. The research methods of the papers are relatively single. In terms of the researcher's situation, the editorial studies in China Individual research is the main focus, and many disciplines pay attention to editorial studies. The research positions are concentrated in journals and magazines. The research strength of universities in Henan and Hubei regions is relatively strong; in terms of research topics, the research results of editing practices are relatively abundant. "Selected topic planning" has become a research hotspot for the past seven years. The study of editorial history has no shortage of highlights for editors. However, research on editorial theory tends to be silent. In general, comparing with the research results before 2010, the editorial study in China has made breakthroughs and innovations in the two topics of topic selection and editing. Based on this, in order to promote the progress of editorial research, relevant departments should also rationally allocate research resources, fully mobilize the research forces in various fields, and strengthen the cooperation and exchange among scholars, disciplines, and regions, and improve The academic community of China's editorial studies should be built; scholars should pay more attention to the study of editorial theory, and the discussion of editorial education and editing techniques should also be deepened to form a more systematic and stable discussion outcome; related scientific decision-making in the selection of topics The application of scholars should continue to follow up and deepen research; the new era puts forward new requirements for editing and publishing, and the promotion of political literacy of editorial subjects will also be the subject that future scholars need to focus on.