行政垄断以其复杂性和极大的危害性引起了社会各界的普遍关注和强烈不满，我国《反垄断法》中单独对行政垄断的规定设置一章，表明国家打击行政垄断的决心与态度。但自《反垄断法》实施以来，涉嫌行政垄断的事例屡有发生，行政主体的行政权力与市场主体合法权利之间的矛盾愈演愈烈，以及行政垄断的激增，这意味着该法对行政垄断的规制还存在严重的缺陷，整治行政垄断的效果并不理想。在这样的背景下，探讨和研究行政垄断问题，为消除、禁止或规制行政垄断提供具有可操作性的建议就显得十分必要和迫切。学术界对行政垄断问题进行了较长时间的探索，获得了许多有价值的研究成果，但由于对行政垄断问题的认识角度不同，导致对行政垄断问题的很多方面都存在着严重分歧。本文从近期发生影响较大的“地铁禁报令”入手，讨论事件中反映出反垄断法律制度的不足，并提出适合我国国情的对于行政垄断的救济方法与规制建议，以期满足公民和社会利益的最大化。基于以上事实，本文在既有研究成果的基础上，运用跨学科研究法、法社会学研究法、法哲学研究法、实证研究法、文献研究法等研究方法，通过考察具体案例，对我国的行政垄断救济和法律责任的现状和如何完善做了较系统、较深入细致的研究。本文共分为六个部分，第一部分对“地铁禁报令”事件进行了简单的介绍，使事件的起因，发展及结果有了较为清晰的轮廓，并提出了主要的法律焦点，为全文的论证打下了基础。第二部分是对行政垄断问题的基本概述，重点分析了行政垄断的概念、特征和分类，厘清行政垄断与相关概念的关系，为下文的论证打下理论基础。第三部分是从“地铁禁报令”事件入手，对行政垄断行为的违法构成要件进行阐述和分析，为行政垄断行为的认定提供了依据。第四部分是对“地铁禁报令”事件中体现的行政垄断救济制度的进一步思考，来考察我国目前对行政垄断救济制度的立法现状，分析了不足与缺陷，提出了完善行政垄断救济制度的建议与对策。最后一个部分是通过分析“地铁禁报令”事件中所体现出行政垄断法律责任问题，总结我国行政垄断法律责任的现行法律规定，指出了存在的问题与不足，进一步提出完善行政垄断法律责任的具有可操作性的方案，以期对我国行政垄断法律责任的建构提供建议。

Administrative Monopoly arise wide attention and deprecation from all circles of the society for its complexity and huge harmfulness. There is a chapter of the Act provides for administrative monopoly in the Chinese antimonopoly law, which shows the determination and attitude toward the prohibition of administrative monopoly. Since the Antimonopoly Law has promulgated and put into effect, the case on suspicion of administrative monopoly occurred frequently. The contradiction between administrative power of administrative subject and the legal rights of market subject becomes increasingly evident, which means there are still serious shortcomings in the regulating administrative monopoly. The result of straightening administrative monopoly is not desirable. Discussing and researching the problems of administrative monopoly and providing workable recommendation of eliminating, prohibiting and regulating the administrative monopoly in this backdrop, it appears to be the necessary and urgent problem at present. This article starts with the case of Subway Newspaper Ban, discussing the problems of antimonopoly legal system in our country, and explores improving in line with our administrative monopoly of the national antimonopoly mechanisms to maximize the interests of individual and society. Domestic theoretical field have a long discussion on administrative monopoly and draw some valuable conclusions. Due to different viewpoints of researching on administrative monopoly, severe bifurcations lie in various aspects of administrative monopoly issue.Using multi-discipline study method, social jurisprudential method, law philosophy analytical method, empirical research method, this article gives a more comprehensive and deeper research on judicial relief of administrative monopoly and how to control it in our country. The article is divided into five main parts. Part one gives a brief introduction to the event of Subway Newspaper Ban, which makes a clearer outline of cause and development in this event, and brings up the legal focus. Part two introduces the basic theory of administrative monopoly, detailed analyzing the concept, feature and types and clarifying its concept with the related, which provides the theoretical foundation for the following argument. Part three elaborates constitution requirements of administrative monopoly behavior in the case, which provides a legal basis for the act administrative monopoly. Part four is about a further reflection of current legislation on administrative monopoly relief system in China. Through the analysis of Subway Newspaper Ban, it elaborates the problem and provides the suggestions of improving the administrative monopoly relief system. The last part is to discuss the legal liability of administrative monopoly by analyzing the case of Subway Newspaper Ban. The author gives a summarization of laws and regulations in force about legal liability of administrative monopoly, points out existed problems and on the basic, perfects the Antimonopoly regulations of administrative monopoly.