中文题名: | 论虐待罪中“家庭成员”范围的认定 |
姓名: | |
保密级别: | 公开 |
论文语种: | chi |
学科代码: | 035101 |
学科专业: | |
学生类型: | 硕士 |
学位: | 法律硕士 |
学位类型: | |
学位年度: | 2024 |
校区: | |
学院: | |
研究方向: | 刑法学 |
第一导师姓名: | |
第一导师单位: | |
提交日期: | 2024-06-16 |
答辩日期: | 2024-05-25 |
外文题名: | INTERPRETATION ON THE FAMILY MEMBER IN THE CRIME OF MALTREATMENT |
中文关键词: | |
外文关键词: | Maltreatment ; Family Member ; Extensive Family Member ; Quasi Family Member |
中文摘要: |
现行刑法第260条将虐待罪限于“家庭成员”之间的虐待行为,但未明确界定虐待罪中“家庭成员”的范围。客观上立法依据的不明确和主观上认定标准的不统一导致虐待罪中“家庭成员”范围存在认定困境。虐待罪中“家庭成员”范围亟待解释,虐待罪中“家庭成员”范围的认定思路亟待厘清。 在家庭形态日趋复杂化的社会背景下,虐待罪中“家庭成员”范围应适度扩大,以有效弥补立法不足、认定标准不统一的问题,并最终实现刑法目的。对虐待罪中“家庭成员”范围作出扩大解释时必须采取必要限制,禁止采用对行为人有利之外的类推解释且禁止采用目的性扩张解释。在法解释学具体分析的过程中,以文理解释为本源,以体系解释为方向指引,以客观目的解释为落脚点,将虐待罪中“家庭成员”范围解释为三类群体:共同生活的核心家庭成员,共同生活的泛家庭成员和共同生活的准家庭成员。 在创新虐待罪中“家庭成员”范围的解释结论的基础之上,提出单独认定要素和复合认定要素的概念,并创设虐待罪中“家庭成员”范围的认定思路。虐待罪中“家庭成员”范围认定的总思路:亲缘关系愈近,认定标准愈低;亲缘关系愈远,认定标准愈高。对于第一类共同生活的核心家庭成员,须具备核心家庭成员身份要素这一单独认定要素;对于第二类共同生活的泛家庭成员,须同时具备客观层面和主观方面的复合认定要素;对于第三类共同生活的准家庭成员,须同时具备客观层面和主观层面的复合认定要素并且符合严格限制要求。 |
外文摘要: |
Article 260 of the current Criminal Law makes it clear that the crime of maltreatment is limited to acts of maltreatment between family members. Since the scope of family members is not clearly defined, the ambiguity of the objective legislative basis and the subjective inconsistency of the criteria for determining the scope of family members in the crime of maltreatment have led to a dilemma in determining the scope of family members. For this reason, the scope of family members in the crime of maltreatment needs urgent explanation, and the idea of determining the scope of family members in the crime of maltreatment needs to be clarified. In the social context of increasingly complex family patterns, the scope of family members in the crime of maltreatment should be expanded moderately, in order to effectively make up for the problems of insufficient legislation and inconsistent determination standards, and ultimately to realize the purpose of criminal law. The rational expanding interpretation of the scope of family members in the crime of maltreatment must be subject to the necessary restrictions, prohibiting the use of analogical interpretations other than those favorable to the perpetrator and prohibiting the use of purposive expansive interpretations. In the process of specific analysis of legal interpretation, with literal interpretation as the source, system interpretation as the direction guide, and objective purpose interpretation as the landing point, the scope of family members in the crime of maltreatment will be interpreted as three types of groups: core family members living together, extensive family members living together, and quasi family members living together. On the basis of the innovative conclusion of the interpretation of the scope of family members in the crime of maltreatment, the concepts of separate elements of interpretation and compound elements of interpretation are proposed, and the idea of the determination of the scope of family members in the crime of maltreatment is created. The general idea behind the determination of the scope of family members in the crime of maltreatment is that the closer the kinship, the lower the standard of determination; the more distant the kinship, the higher the standard of determination. For the first category of core family members living together, there must be a separate element of interpretation, namely the identity of the core family member; for the second category of extensive family members living together, there must be a combination of objective and subjective elements of interpretation; and for the third category of quasi family members living together, there must be a combination of objective and subjective elements of interpretation and compliance with the strict limitation requirements. |
参考文献总数: | 85 |
作者简介: | 谢琛玲,北京师范大学法学院法律(非法学)专业2021级学生。 |
馆藏地: | 总馆B301 |
馆藏号: | 硕035101/24067Z |
开放日期: | 2025-06-17 |