中文题名: | 高中英语项目化学习对学生思维品质影响的案例研究 |
姓名: | |
保密级别: | 公开 |
论文语种: | 英文 |
学科代码: | 045108 |
学科专业: | |
学生类型: | 硕士 |
学位: | 教育硕士 |
学位类型: | |
学位年度: | 2022 |
校区: | |
学院: | |
研究方向: | 教育学与英语教学 |
第一导师姓名: | |
第一导师单位: | |
提交日期: | 2022-05-16 |
答辩日期: | 2022-05-31 |
外文题名: | How Project-Based Learning Influences Students' Thinking Quality: A Case Study of High School English Lessons |
中文关键词: | |
外文关键词: | Project-Based Learning ; Thinking Quality ; English Core Competency ; Case Study |
中文摘要: |
随着英语学科核心素养的提出,思维品质在国内外引发广泛关注。为提升学生的英语核心素养,《普通高中英语课程标准》指出,除常规教学外,教师应组织更加开放的、具有挑战性的活动,如项目化学习,激发学生主动参与,为学生展现自我、挑战自我、 突破自我、相互学习创造最佳的学习环境(教育部,2020)。开展项目化学习符合培养英语学科核心素养的要求。自新课程改革以来,项目化学习受到广泛关注。《普通高中英语课程标准》(2020)明确提出应关注项目化学习,增加 Project 板块亦是英语教材改革的主要特点之一。项目化学习要求学生深入探索真实问题,在做项目的过程中提高其分析问题和解决问题的能力,促进思维发展,与培养学生思维品质紧密相关。然而,项目化学习的实施现状仍然令人担忧,英语学科的相关研究仍很有限。因此,为项目化学习的实施提供建议以促进学生的思维品质发展是非常必要的。
本文将在系统梳理已有相关文献的基础上建构出项目化学习与学生思维品质之间关系的理论框架,并通过开展案例研究进行深入探索,旨在回答一个核心问题:项目化学习和学生思维发展之间有什么关系。为了解决这个核心问题,笔者将其拆分为三个具体问题: 1)Y 高中是如何开展项目化学习的? 2)Y 高中学生的思维品质得到了哪些发展?3)项目化学习的哪些因素影响了学生的思维品质发展?该研究主要采用了案例研究法,并在数据收集阶段,使用了参与式观察法、访谈法和实物收集法,以求收集丰富的一手资料。研究持续时间为五周,共有 Y 高中的 120 名高中一年级学生和 6 名教师参与了本次研究。在实施项目之前,笔者通过访谈 6 名教师、收集 12 个曾经的项目化学习产品以及长达两个月的课堂观察,明确了案例学校中项目化学习的开展情况。在项目实施过程中,收集了多种数据来分析学生思维品质的发展,包括 6 次课堂观察记录、17 页教材、6 份教案、6 份PPT、学生在线会议录像、小组交流记录,以及师生之间的音频或文字版的交流记录。在项目学习实施后,笔者收集了 480 份学生学习日记和 17 个项目化学习产品,并访谈了 18 名学生。为了解学生思维品质的变化以及变化背后的原因,笔者对所有材料进行了深入分析。 本研究有三个核心发现。1)Y 高中是如何开展项目化学习的:Y 高中的教师根据英语核心素养的要求有策略地制定了项目学习的教学计划,采用差异化的英语教学策略来提高学生的思维品质,并使用英语通过三种评估方法来评价学生的思维品质的发展。2)通过实施项目化学习,Y 高中学生的思维品质得到了哪些发展:研究发现,学生的思维品质整体上有所提高。大多数学生认为他们的逻辑性思维和批判性思维得到了明显的改善,而学生在创造性思维方面的提高则有所差异。3)项目化学习的哪些因素影响了学生的思维品质发展:研究发现,项目化学习主要通过反馈和改进,以及持续的探究来促进学生思维品质的发展。此外,反思、学生的发言权和选择权以及公开展示项目成果也是促进学生思维品质提高的重要因素。本次研究也发现了一些阻碍学生思维品质发展的因素,其中最大的阻碍是学生的学业负担过重。合作不畅、缺乏经验以及思维定势是其他阻碍学生思维品质发展的因素。 本研究也为未来项目化学习的开展提供了教学启示。本研究发现仍需提高对英语项目化学习的重视程度,从而更好地培养学生的思维品质。此外,应采取切实可行的英语教学方法,以确保英语项目化学习在促进学生思维品质方面的有效性。另外,在英语项目化学习中教师应启发学生考虑到潜在观众和学生之间种族背景的差别。同时,在疫情的背景下,教师也需要慎重选择合适的教学主题。尽管本研究提供了一些可行建议,但本研究也存在一定的局限性。一方面,本次项目化学习在寒假期间实施的,因此增加了学生合作的困难。另一方面,受教学课时所限,笔者在本研究中没有涉及量规、前后测以及问卷调查,若现实条件允许,应增加量化数据以印证本次的研究结果。 |
外文摘要: |
With the proposal of core competencies for the English subject, thinking quality has attracted increasing attention at home and abroad. To promote the four core competencies, the General High School English Curriculum Standards pointed out that in addition to regular teaching, teachers should organize more challenging activities, such as Project-Based Learning, to stimulate students to actively participate, enabling them to present and challenge themselves, and to cooperate better with their peers (MOE, 2020). Project-Based Learning meets the requirements of cultivating core competencies for English subjects. The General High School English Curriculum Standards (2020) proposed that PBL should be given more attention. Consequently, the new-version textbooks now include a project section to stress the significance of this learning method. Students are required to explore authentic questions profoundly and improve their abilities to analyze and solve questions, thus promoting their thinking quality. However, the implementation of Project-Based Learning is still worrying and has several problems; thus, it is of great necessity to give proper suggestions in implementing it in order to promote students' thinking quality. A conceptual framework has been formed based on a thorough review of thinking quality, PBL, and cultivating thinking quality through PBL. This study aims to answer a significant question: What are the relationships between PBL and students' thinking quality development? To solve this critical question, it has been divided into three specific questions: 1) How the teachers in Y High School conducted PBL; 2) What improvement was brought to students thinking quality through implementing PBL; 3) What factors in PBL influenced students' thinking quality? The case research method has been used to answer these questions. The participatory observation method, interviews, and artificial collection were used in depth in the data collection stage to collect first-hand data and explore the entire research process. The research lasted for five weeks, and a total of 120 year seven students and six teachers from Y High School participated in this research. Before implementing the project, the researcher clarified how the PBL is conducted in the case school through interviews with six teachers, 12 past PBL products, and the class observation for two months. During the project, various data were collected to analyze students' improvements in thinking quality, including six class observations records, 17 pages of teaching materials, six lesson plans, six PPTs, video-recorded online student meetings, daily groups communication records, as well as the audio or text-version communication records between teachers and students. After implementing the PBL, the researcher collected 480 students' diaries and 17 PBL products and also interviewed 18 students. All the materials have been thoroughly analyzed in order to understand the changes in students' thinking quality and the reasons behind the changes. This study has three core findings: 1) How the teachers in Y High School conducted PBL: teachers in Y High School strategically designed their PBL teaching plans based on the requirements of English core competencies, used differentiated English instructional teaching strategies to improve students' thinking quality; and used three kinds of assessment methods in English through the whole process to evaluate students' thinking quality. 2) What improvement was brought to students thinking quality through implementing PBL: the study found that students showed improvement in their thinking quality. Logical and critical thinking were agreed to be significantly improved by most students, while students' ideas were distinguished in creative thinking. 3) What factors in PBL influenced students' thinking quality: It was found that PBL is conducive to students' thinking quality mostly because students need to critique and revise their work and keep sustained inquiry. In addition, PBL promotes students' thinking quality through reflection, gives them opportunities to choose, and stimulates their enthusiasm to think through a product to be presented to the public. There are also many remaining challenges in thinking quality. The biggest block is students' academic burden; poor cooperation, lack of experience, and a conservative mindset are some other factors that can obstruct students' thinking quality development. Based on research results and discussions, implications for future PBL teaching are provided, and the limitations of this research are carefully reflected. The research findings also provide implications for future PBL. Most important, more attention needs to be attached to PBL teaching to improve students' thinking quality. In addition, practical English instructional methods should be adopted to ensure the effectiveness of PBL in promoting students' thinking quality. Meanwhile, the different ethnic backgrounds between possible audiences and the students need to be taken into consideration in English PBL. Teachers also need to be careful in selecting suitable themes and topics, especially under the background of the pandemic. Although contributions and implications are presented, the study does have limitations. This PBL was implemented during the winter vacation, thus increasing students' difficulties in cooperation. Furthermore, taking students' heavy academic load into consideration, the researcher did not include a measuring gauge, pre-test and post-test, and questionnaires in this research, and if possible, it would be better to add some quantitative data to supplement the research results.
|
参考文献总数: | 90 |
馆藏号: | 硕045108/22022 |
开放日期: | 2023-06-14 |