近年来，生态环境犯罪愈发频繁，保护环境、改善生态成为人们关注的重点课题。自党的十八大以来，我国大力推进生态文明建设，并取得了显著成效。但是，生态环境领域的问题仍旧突出，加强对生态环境法益的保护不仅必要而且相当紧迫。惩治环境犯罪作为有效维护生态环境的重要手段，最终目标是不仅是对环境犯罪人施以惩罚，还包括生态环境的有效恢复，以及确保社会公众的多种法益被有效保护。

在传统的环境刑事司法中，我国惩治环境犯罪是以“自由刑+罚金刑”的模式为主，虽然能够惩罚犯罪，但是对受到损害的环境恢复方面的作用比较有限。近年来，恢复性司法逐渐被运用在环境犯罪中。与传统的刑事司法不同，恢复性司法以恢复受损害的生态环境为目标，达到惩罚犯罪和恢复环境的统一，切实保护环境法益，这与生态文明建设的内涵相契合，并且可以弥补传统报应性司法模式的不足。

虽然恢复性司法在环境犯罪目前的实践中取得了一定的正向效果，但仍存在一定的困境，具体表现为缺乏法律依据、司法鉴定标准不统一、资金保障与监督机制不完善等，还需要进一步的完善。本文在恢复性司法的视野下，结合司法实践中的案例，考察恢复性司法在环境犯罪实践中出现的问题，并提出完善的建议。本文对环境犯罪恢复性司法的研究主要从以下几个部分展开：

第一部分为绪论。本部分阐述了研究的背景和目的，围绕所研究的问题对国内外的研究现状进行大致综述，表明本文的研究方法和意义。

第二部分为阐述环境犯罪恢复性司法的基本理念，通过对环境犯罪和恢复性司法的相关概念和特征的厘清，为恢复性司法在环境犯罪中引入的合理性以及正当性奠定基础。

第三部分为我国环境犯罪恢复性司法的现状及存在问题研究。从两个方面展开：一是统计近三年环境犯罪恢复性司法相关的案例，并总结其特征；二是对目前环境犯罪恢复性司法实践中的问题进行分析。

第四部分为环境犯罪恢复性司法的域外考察。通过对其他国家例如加拿大、澳大利亚、新西兰等国的环境犯罪恢复性司法的立法制度和司法实践进行考察，为国内的环境犯罪恢复性司法的完善提供经验和借鉴。

第五部分是我国环境犯罪恢复性司法的完善路径分析。结合目前国内的实践状况和域外考察经验，为环境犯罪恢复性司法的制度完善提供行之有效的建议。

In recent years, ecological crimes have become more and more frequent. However, the problems in the field of ecology and environment are still prominent, and it is not only necessary but also urgent to strengthen the protection of ecological and environmental legal interests. As a special type of criminal offense, the object of environmental crime includes not only personal rights and interests, but also ecological environment, social relations and other legal interests. Therefore, the ultimate goal of punishing environmental crimes as an important means to the ecological environment, but also to effectively restore the ecological environment.

China's means of regulating environmental crimes is based on the model of "free imprisonment + fine", which can effectively punish the offender but has limited effect on the restoration of the damaged environment. Restorative justice is gradually used in the criminal justice of environmental crimes. Unlike traditional criminal justice, restorative justice aims to restore the damaged ecological environment, and can make up for the defects of the traditional retributive justice model.

Although restorative justice has achieved certain positive effects in environmental crimes, there are still certain dilemmas, specifically the lack of legal basis, unified standards of forensic identification, imperfect financial guarantee and supervision mechanism, etc., which need further improvement. This paper mainly examines the problems of restorative justice in environmental crime practice under the vision of restorative justice, and puts forward suggestions for improvement. The research on restorative justice for environmental crimes in this paper is carried out in the following parts:

The first part is the introduction. This part elaborates the background and purpose of the study, provides a general overview of the current state of research at home and abroad around the issues studied in this paper, and indicates the research methodology and significance of this paper.

The second part elaborates the basic concept of restorative justice for environmental crimes, and lays the foundation for the rationality and justification of restorative justice in environmental crimes by clarifying the relevant concepts and characteristics of environmental crimes and restorative justice.

The third part is a study of the current situation and problems of restorative justice for environmental crimes in China. The first part is a statistical study of the cases related to restorative justice for environmental crimes in the past three years and summarizes its characteristics; the second part is an analysis of the current problems.

The fourth part is an extraterritorial examination of restorative justice for environmental crimes. By examining the legislative system and judicial practice of restorative justice for environmental crimes in other countries, such as Canada and Australia, we provide experience and reference for the improvement of restorative justice in China.

The fifth part is the analysis of the restorative justice of environmental crimes in China. Combining the current domestic practice and overseas experience, we provide effective suggestions for the improvement of the restorative environmental justice system.