在信息技术的推动下，互联网迎来了一个“人人皆有麦克风”的时代。微博、 微信等新兴媒体成为人们讨论热点话题的主要网络平台。豆瓣作为集博客、小组、 社交、购物为一体的社区网络，既不同于紧密联系的强关系网络，也不同于松散 的弱关系网络。豆瓣用户基于兴趣组成小组，面对共同感兴趣的话题更加主动、 平等地进行讨论。当微信、微博等媒体受到舆论导向的压力而失声时，豆瓣小组 因其小众化的定位就成为了网民就某公共事件展开讨论的主要场域。 2018 年 7 月，“Me Too”运动点燃了中国的网络舆论场，在母标签“Me Too” 之下，受害者对不同人物的举报又产生了若干舆论子话题。本研究以“Me Too” 运动为代表的舆论聚集行为在豆瓣小组中的传播为例，采用定性与定量相结合的 研究方法，探讨“Me Too”舆论话题在有“豆瓣第一娱乐向讨论组”之称的“豆 瓣鹅组”中的建构。首先运用定性比较分析法，选取“豆瓣鹅组”中“Me Too” 运动的若干子话题，比较分析网络公共事件本身具有引发广泛讨论的影响因子， 总结出微观组合路径。其次，对已经筛选出的子话题进行社会网络分析，研究在 演化发展中网络社区的关系脉络，分析除话题本身特点外，意见领袖对话题的舆 论导向作用，并对现存的现象问题进行反思。 研究发现，作为一起网络公共事件，“Me Too”运动的子话题在“豆瓣鹅组” 中共有 3 种可以引起广泛讨论的微观组合路径，分别是“实名举报+事件指向学 术教育界或媒体娱乐界+无删帖等噪音干扰+舆论主体负面回应”、“实名举报+舆 论共振+无删帖等噪音干扰+舆论主体负面回应”和“实名举报+舆论共振+事件指 向学术教育界或媒体娱乐界+舆论主体负面回应”。另一方面，小组中的意见领袖 具有人以“趣”分、交流平等、交互独立的特点，他们通过对议题加入情感属性 而推动话题的传播，又基于社群划分的用户关系在一定程度上消解信息茧房带来 的负面影响。在整个话题建构过程中，存在两个主要问题：一是官方的舆论把控 过于简单粗暴，单纯的删帖、屏蔽不利于网民对抗情绪的消解；二是用户情绪的 高度一致性易演变集合行为，甚至化为运动目的达成的阻碍。

Driven by information technology, the Internet ushered in an era of "everyone has a microphone". Weibo, WeChat, and other emerging media have become the main online platforms for people to discuss hot topics. Douban, as a community network integrating blogs, small groups, social interaction and shopping, is different from either the closely connected strong-tie network or the loosely connected weak-tie network. Douban users form groups based on their interests and discuss topics of common interest more actively and equally. When WeChat, Weibo and other media lose their voices under the pressure of public opinion surveillance, Douban groups become the main field for netizens to discuss public events due to its niche positioning. In July 2018, the "Me Too" movement ignited the online public opinion field in China. Under the parent label "Me Too", victims' reports on different public figures have generated several sub-topics of public opinion. Taking the evolution of the public opinion gathering behavior represented by the "Me Too" movement in the Douban group as an example, this study combines the method of qualitative and quantitative research to explore the construction of the "Me Too" public opinion topics in the "Douban Goose Group", which is known as "Douban’s No.1 entertainment-oriented discussion group". Firstly, qualitative comparative analysis was applied to select several sub-topics of the "Me Too" movement in the "Douban Goose Group", to compare and analyze the influencing factors of network public events, and to summarize their microcombinational paths. Secondly, social network analysis has been carried out on selected sub-topics to study the context of network community in its evolution and development, analyze the characteristics of topics as well as the role of opinion leaders in guiding public opinion on those topics, and reflect on existing phenomena problems. Studies have found that as a public events, the "Me Too" movement in the "Douban Goose Group" have three micro-combinational paths, respectively the "real-name reporting + events toward the academia or media and entertainment industry + no noise interference such as post deletion + negative response from the opinion target", "realname reporting + no noise interference such as post deletion+ negative response from the opinion target " and "real-name reporting + public opinion resonance + events toward the academia or media and entertainment industry + negative response from the opinion target ". On the other hand, the opinion leaders in the group are characterized by "interest", equal communication and independent interaction. They promote the spread of the topic by adding emotional attributes to the topic, and the user relationship based on the division of the community can eliminate the negative impact of information cocoon to some extent. In the whole process of topic construction, there are two main problems: firstly, the control of public opinion by officials is too simple and crude, and simply deleting and blocking the posts is not conducive to the resolution of netizen’s resistant emotion; secondly, the highly homogenous emotions can easily evolve into collective actions, and even become obstacles to achieve the goal of the movement. KEY WORDS：Network