安州六器是北宋末年出土的著名青铜器，宋徽宗重和戊戌年出土于安州（今孝感），共六件，四件为鼎，一件为觯，一件为甗。其中两件鼎铭文相同，因此共有五种不同的铭文。其中四篇篇幅较长，且内容涉及到西周早期晚段周昭王南征这一重大历史事件，具有重要的史料价值。然而长期以来关于安州六器所指的器物具体为哪六件、铭文文字应当如何释读、以及铭文具体反映了哪些史实等问题，学者们众说纷纭，至今仍有许多分歧。随着近年来静方鼎、??甗等铭文与此有关联的青铜器的出土和西周早期曾国、鄂国考古产生的新发现，以上问题有了新的讨论空间。本文拟在前辈学者研究的基础上，结合新材料，着重研究以下问题： 第一部分，对“安州六器”这一概念所指内容的时代变迁、四篇长篇铭文的内容进行研究。通过史源学的分析，“安州六器”在宋代所指的内容与现今研究中所使用的不同，宋代概念里不包括中觯，而包括作册豊鼎。近代学者引述的其它器物虽出土于孝感，但并不是重和戊戌岁安州进献于皇宫的六件器物之一，因此不能列入安州六器。不过当前研究中仍可使用学术界自郭沫若先生的研究以来所约定俗成的概念，以中觯为“安州六器”之一，而不包括作册豊鼎。四篇长篇铭文为三件中方鼎的两种铭文、一件中觯铭文、一件中甗铭文，它们均具有重要的史料价值，而对其文字释读多有差异，因此首先对已有研究进行集释，通过按语尽可能厘清文意，为后续研究奠定基础。 第二部分，安州六器的四种长篇铭文中记录了许多与昭王南征相关的时间，并可与其他记录有昭王南征时间的器物进行联系。综合安州六器和作册夨令簋、??叔鼎、静方鼎、??甗、遣器、作册折器、作册睘器、召卣等器物中记载的昭王南征历日信息，根据铭文中记录的活动之间的逻辑关系、科学的先秦时期朔日干支表等，可以重新排列各器所对应的周昭王年历。通过重新排谱，周昭王第一次南征应当从昭王十四年已经开始筹备，经过两年的时间，王朝官员“中”、“静”等人广泛联络南方诸侯、修治贯通道路、为王营建行宫，至昭王十六年方正式发兵，十七年胜利归来。 第三部分，安州六器中亦记载了多处与南征相关的地点，综合考察安州六器和作册夨令簋、启尊、启卣、遣器等铭文所记载的昭王南征所经地点，辨析其文字的释读，并结合古籍中所记载的地名，可以判断各件器物中地名在今天的什么位置。通过其地理位置与各器的时间关系，可以勾勒出昭王南征所使用的道路应当是从宗周出发，经散关道进入汉中，顺汉水而下，征伐楚荆。第一次南征胜利后再向东到达曾、鄂诸侯国都，大会南方诸侯，举行振旅的仪式，加强了王朝与南土诸侯之间的联系。

The six vessels of anzhou are famous bronzes unearthed in the late Northern Song Dynasty. Huizong Chong of the Song Dynasty and Wuxunian Wares were unearthed in Anzhou (today's Xiaogan). There are six pieces, four for the tripod, one for the Yu and one for the Yu. Two of them are the same, so there are five different inscriptions. Four of them are relatively long, and their contents are related to the important historical event of Zhou Zhaowang's Southern Expedition in the early and late Western Zhou Dynasty, which is of great historical value. However, for a long time, scholars have different opinions on which six objects the six vessels refer to, how to interpret the inscriptions, and what historical facts the inscriptions reflect. With the unearthing of bronzes related to Jingfangding and Wu inscriptions in recent years and the new discoveries of Zeng and E Archaeology in the early Western Zhou Dynasty, there is a new space for discussion on the above issues. On the basis of previous scholars'research and new materials, this paper focuses on the following issues: In the first part, the changes of the times and the contents of four long inscriptions in the concept of #Six Artifacts of Anzhou# are studied. According to the analysis of historical origin, the content of #The six vessels of anzhou# in Song Dynasty is different from that used in the present study. The concept of Song Dynasty does not include Zhongyu, but includes the compilation of Quding. Although other artifacts quoted by modern scholars were unearthed in Xiaogan, they were not one of the six artifacts dedicated to the Imperial Palace in Anzhou at the age of 1898, so they could not be included in the Six Artifacts of Anzhou. However, in the current study, the concept of Zhongyu as one of the #six instruments of Anzhou# can still be used, which has been agreed upon by the academic circles since Mr. Guo Moruo#s research, and does not include the compilation of the book #Ding#. Four long inscriptions are two kinds of inscriptions of three Chinese tripod, one Zhongyu inscription and one Zhongyu inscription. They all have important historical data value, but there are many differences in the interpretation of their characters. Therefore, first of all, we collect and interpret the existing studies, and try to clarify the meaning as far as possible according to the language, so as to lay the foundation for the follow-up study. In the second part, four long inscriptions of the Six Artifacts of Anzhou recorded many times related to the Southern Expedition of Zhaowang, and could be linked with other artifacts that recorded the Southern Expedition of Zhaowang. Based on the logical relationship between the activities recorded in the inscriptions and the scientific pre-Qin Shuri Ganzhi table, the corresponding calendar of Zhou Zhaowang can be rearranged by synthesizing the calendar information of Zhaowang#s Southern Expedition recorded in the Six Articles of Anzhou and the implements of compiling brochures, Shuding, Jingfangding, Gong, dispatching artifacts, compiling folders, compiling brochures and summoning tables. Through rearrangement, the first Southern Expedition of King Zhao of Zhou should begin in 14 years. After two years, officials of the Dynasty such as Zhongjing and Jingjing contacted the southern princes extensively, repaired the crossing road, built a palace for the king, and formally launched troops in 16 years, and returned victoriously in 17 years. In the third part, there are many places related to the Southern Expedition recorded in the Six Artifacts of Anzhou. By comprehensively investigating the places where the Six Artifacts of Anzhou and the inscriptions of the writings such as the imperial edict, the reverence, the inscription and the dispatch artifacts recorded in the inscriptions of the Six Artifacts of Anzhou, we can distinguish and analyze the interpretation of their characters, and by combining with the place names recorded in the ancient books, we can judge where the place names of the artifacts are today. Through its geographical location and the time relationship between the vessels, it can be outlined that the road used by Zhaowang#s Southern Expedition should start from Zongzhou, enter Hanzhong through Sanguan Road, and go down the Hanshui River to expel Chujing. After the first victory of the Southern Expedition, they arrived eastward to the capital of Zeng and Hubei, and the Southern Marquises of the General Assembly held the ceremony of revitalizing the brigade, which strengthened the link between the Dynasty and the Southern Marquises.