随着我国破坏野生动物资源刑事犯罪案件的日渐增多，该类案件的定罪量刑问题引起了社会的热议。2017年3月深圳市宝安区人民法院的一则“鹦鹉案”的刑事判决，在社会上受到了民众热切的关注。无独有偶，这几年的大学生“掏鸟案”、东北的“玉米案”、河南“野草案”等在定罪量刑上的审判，让普通民众尤其与这些案件有相似身份的人惊出一身冷汗，引发舆论哗然。对于此类案件，到底在定罪量刑上应该如何分析和操作，此类案件的定罪量刑引发如此热议是因为我国对野生动物保护的相关法律法规不普及，还是因为在法院在审判的时候机械司法，裁量倚重？本文以“鹦鹉案”的一审为例对该类刑事案件中的争议问题进行简单分析。

With the increasing number of criminal cases of destruction of wild animal resources in China, the problem of conviction and sentencing of such cases has aroused heated discussions in society. In March 2017, a criminal decision in the “Parrot Case” of the People’s Court of Bao’an District of Shenzhen City received eager attention from the public. Coincidentally, the trials on conviction and sentencing, such as the "college student birds’ digging case”, the "maize case" in the northeast, and the Henan "wild draft" in the past few years, have caused ordinary people, especially those with similar identities in these cases, to be astonished，leading to public opinion boiling. For such cases, how to analyze and operate? The reason why such cases are so hotly debated is whether China's laws and regulations concerning the protection of wildlife are not popularized, or whether the judicial practice of the court is very mechanized? This article takes the first instance of the "Parrot Case" as an example to analyze the controversial issues in this type of criminal case.