帮信罪已然成为整个电信网络诈骗犯罪链条上的第一大罪名，但现下与帮信罪罪名认定争议方面的讨论盛况相比，较少有学者对该罪的刑罚实践效果予以讨论。为此本文选取2019年－2023年1332份一审判决书为样本，从刑罚种类与刑期长短两个层面探讨刑罚强度的多维度影响因素以及这些因素如何在法律框架内相互作用，实证结果表明，能够对刑种选择产生显著影响的因素有支付结转金额、违法所得金额、立功表现、初偶犯、自首、坦白、累犯与前科，此外被告受教育程度也会对刑罚种类产生一定的负向影响；能够对有期徒刑刑期长短产生较为显著的作用的因素有支付结转金额、违法所得数额、主从犯认定、前科与累犯，但作用比例存在一定的瑕疵；仅支付结转金额对拘役刑期长短产生显著影响；仅立功表现对缓刑考验期长短产生显著影响。这些结果反映出了帮信罪刑罚存在法内因素适用不规范、法外因素影响较大等瑕疵，同时模型的解释率也反映出帮信罪存在量刑失衡的问题，这显然会限制刑罚预防功能的发挥，为此本文也提出了可能的优化路径，包括建立更加完备的定罪机制、构建更加科学的量刑标准参考体系、继续深化量刑程序的改革等，以期实现对电信网络诈骗犯罪的有效打击和规范处理。

The Offence of Assisting Cybercrime has become the primary charge in the entire chain of telecommunications fraud crimes. However, compared to the fervent discussions surrounding the controversy over the charge of The Offence of Assisting Cybercrime, there are fewer scholars discussing the practical effects of punishment for this crime. Therefore, this article selects 1332 first-instance judgments from 2019 to 2023 as samples to explore the multidimensional influencing factors of punishment intensity from the perspectives of types of punishment and length of sentence, as well as how these factors interact within the legal framework. Empirical results indicate that significant factors affecting the choice of punishment type include the amount of transferred payments, the amount of illegal gains, the performance of the offender, whether it's their first offense, confession, self-surrender, confession, recidivism, and prior criminal records. Additionally, the educational level of the defendant also has a certain negative impact on the type of punishment. Factors that significantly affect the length of imprisonment include the amount of transferred payments, the amount of illegal gains, the identification of principal and accessory offenders, prior criminal records, and recidivism, but there are certain flaws in their proportionate effects. Only the amount of transferred payments significantly affects the length of detention, while only the performance of the offender significantly affects the length of the probationary period. These results reflect flaws in the application of internal legal factors and significant external influences on punishment for The Offence of Assisting Cybercrime, which evidently limits the preventive function of punishment. Therefore, this article also proposes possible optimization paths, including establishing a more comprehensive conviction mechanism, constructing a more scientifically based sentencing reference system, and continuing to deepen reforms in sentencing procedures, in order to achieve effective crackdowns and standardized handling of telecommunications fraud crimes.